News archive

26th January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250126-A-Year-With-CML200

Fr. Diego Ramón SARRIÓ CUCARELLA appointed bishop of Laghouat in Algeria

As officially announced at noon today, the Holy Father
has appointed our confrere Father

Diego Ramón SARRIÓ CUCARELLA Bishop of the Diocese of Laghouat in Algeria. 

On behalf of the Superior General, the General Council and all the confreres, our sincere congratulations to Diego and the assurance of our prayers and of our fraternal support in his new service of the Church.  

Rome, 25 January 2025 

P. André-Léon SIMONART,
General Secretary.

25th January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250125-A-Year-With-CML200

24th January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250124-A-Year-With-CML200

23rd January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250123-A-Year-With-CML200

22nd January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250122-A-Year-With-CML200

About Lavigerie’s grandmother

ROSE AGNÈS FOURTICOT (1779-1847)

Rose Agnès, Cardinal Lavigerie’s grandmother, was born in Pau on January 21, 1779, in her parents’ home on “rue Nationale” (today rue de maréchal Joffre). She was baptised the same day at the nearby church of Saint-Martin, which was the town’s only church until 1803.

Her father, Pierre Fourticot (1734-1797), was born in Gan (1), and his death certificate of April 3, 1797, reads: “He was an apothecary, who died at three o’clock in the morning, in his home, rue Nationale…”. (2)

A year after the birth of Rose-Agnès, one of his neighbours, Jean Bernadotte joined King Louis XVI’s army. He became King of Sweden in 1818, and his house in rue Tran became a museum; as for Rose-Agnès, she spent her youth in this city during the French Revolution. (3)

She married Pierre (Aîné) Latrilhe (1746-1847) on September 8, 1798, and moved to Huire, in the parish of Saint-Esprit, which at the time wasn’t part of Bayonne but instead belonged to the diocese of Aire-et-Dax in the Landes region. She was the mother of Louise Hermine Latrilhe (1800-1854), mother of Cardinal Lavigerie. She died on December 27, 1847, two years before her grandson Charles was ordained to the priesthood. She now lies beside her daughter, Louise Hermine, in the same cemetery in Bayonne.

(1) In 1949, the winegrowers of Gan created the Jurançon winery, a wine already appreciated by King Henri IV, who was also born in Pau.

(2) “apothicaire” (apothecary) In 1777, a royal decree replaced the name with “pharmacien” (pharmacist), but Paris was a long way off…

(3) The Place Royale near her home once had a statue of King Louis XIV, which was destroyed by the revolutionaries in 1793. King Louis Philippe arranged for the present-day statue of King Henri IV to be made in 1843.
January 21, 2025, the feast of Sainte Agnès

By: Georges Paquet, M.Afr.

21st January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250121-A-Year-With-CML200

Dialogue as a new way of being church

Interreligious dialogue meeting at Tangaza University College, Kenya

Last year (2024), the Church celebrated 60 years of Ecclesiam Suam of Pope Paul VI. In this encyclical letter, the Pope sets Dialogue as the agenda for the Church. The word Dialogue, as a description of communication within the Church, is new. It is not found in pre-conciliar ecclesiology. As such, dialogue expresses an important reality being promoted by the Church since Vatican II.  Pope Paul VI was convinced that “The Church must enter into dialogue with the world in which it lives. It has something to say, a message to give, a communication to make.” (ES 65).  He saw dialogue as the new way of being Church.  There is no other way. One could say that the synodal process initiated by Pope Francis is in line with the vision of his predecessor, Paul VI. This dialogue, says the Pope, begins in the mind of God. “Indeed, the whole history of man’s salvation is one long, varied dialogue, which marvelously begins with God and which He prolongs with men in so many different ways” (ES 70). Since Vatican II the Church has taken a new attitude, indeed a new approach, towards other churches, other religions, including a new approach to cultures, which are viewed in a positive way. 

By issuing Ecclesiam Suam, Paul VI wanted to “demonstrate with increasing clarity how vital it is for the world, and how greatly desired by the Catholic Church, that the two should meet together, and get to know and love one another” (ES 3). This is clearly crystallized in the pastoral constitution on the Church in the modern world (Gaudium et Spes) and in the declaration on the relation of the Church to non-Christian religions (Nostra Aetate). Ecclesiam Suam was written in the spirit of aggiornamento that called for a change of mindset and renewal of attitudes. Thus, it became imperative to Pope Paul VI to “examine the mental attitude, which the Catholic Church must adopt regarding the contemporary world.” (ES, 58), thus, setting the Church’s agenda for dialogue. This agenda is guided by three fundamental principles: (a) A deepening self-knowledge on the part of the church (ES 9-40); (b) Renewal and reform within the church (ES 41-57), (c) Greater dialogue between the Church and the world (ES 58, 108).

Dialogue was so dear to Paul VI that he created in 1964 the Secretariat for non-Christians, now the dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue, and in 1965 he created the Secretariat for Dialogue with non-believers. Pope John XXIII had already crated the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity in 1960, while John Paul II created the Pontifical Council for Culture in 1982. The creation of these offices show important dialogue is for the life of and the mission entrusted to the Church. Pope Paul VI’s message is still relevant today.  Dialogue is rooted in the Church’ self-awareness of her identity and mission.  Consequently, Church members are called to a pastoral conversion, from a church that looks inwards to a church that looks forward and engages with the world. This has been echoed by Pope Francis in Evangelii Gaudium.

 It is in this line, that the Tangaza Institute for Interreligious Dialogue and Islamic Studies (IRDIS), sponsored by the Missionaries of Africa, endeavours to promote intercultural and interreligious dialogue, as part and parcel of the evangelizing mission of the Church. Therefore, the Church exhorts us, through dialogue and collaboration, to recognize, preserve and promote the good things, spiritual and moral, as well as the socio-cultural values found among different cultures and religions. (NA, 2). The Council of Europe defines intercultural dialogue as “an open and respectful exchange of views between individuals and groups belonging to different cultures that leads to a deeper understanding of the other’s global perception.”

This deeper understanding of cultural diversity is a pre-requisite of social cohesion and peaceful co-existence among tribes, nations and religions. IRDIS offers a variety of programmes, both academic as well as practical, that prepare and equip pastoral agents to minister in intercultural and interreligious environments. Students are introduced into the knowledge of the religious other. The knowledge of their cultural and religious setting is fundamental. At least, this is the basic conviction that we, and our partners in interreligious dialogue, have come to appreciate. Those who participate in our Annual Summer School on Christian Muslim dialogue in Africa tell us how the programme is transformative. They come to the programme with fear and apprehension. But all agree at the end that the introduction to the religious other has helped them overcome their prejudices and has opened their mind to accept the different other.

A group of Muslims from Uganda which attended one of our Summer School programmes took the initiative to contact our confreres at Lourdel House in Uganda. Since then, they have been in contact and do joint activities. For some of them it was the first time to have such a concrete experience of interreligious dialogue. They told me that they had not experienced it before. Likewise in 2018 we invited our partners from Iran to our first Summer School in that year. As a sign of appreciation of the programme, they made it compulsory for each of their intake. We are now on the 5th edition of the programme. In the past, confreres were systematically introduced to local languages and local cultures. Through a lengthy period, confreres came to appreciate the richness of the cultures that they encountered. Those language centres have become true laboratories for intercultural dialogue.

We cannot underestimate the importance of training and ongoing formation. The Society could take advantage of our own institutions such as IFIC and IRDIS to train confreres in encounter and dialogue. Real dialogue is possible only in the presence of mutual knowledge and acceptance of cultural and religious values. Intercultural and interreligious dialogue are an antidote to the rising of religious tensions, radicalisation, extremism and interfaith violence. Today we cannot ignore the role of religion in peacebuilding and social cohesion. As we celebrate 60 years of Vatican II, let us embrace the path of renewal set in motion by John XXIII and faithfully carried out by his successor. Dialogue is the way of the future. This dialogue is built on our common shared values, in the appreciation of cultural and religious diversity. There is no turning back.

By: Innocent H. Maganya, M.Afr.

20th January in the life of Charles Cardinal Lavigerie

20250120-A-Year-With-CML200